Fair Fill Intelligence
Venue performance dashboard
Compare recent perp execution quality across Jupiter, Adrena, Phoenix, and GMX using the same decoded fills and exact-second Autonom benchmarks as the Fair Fill page. Lower bps is better; negative execution bps means price improvement versus the benchmark.
This is an operational dashboard. It ranks venues by estimated round-trip cost: doubled recent leg slippage plus doubled venue fee. Gas is excluded. GMX fees are flagged unverified until validated against the venue UI.
time window
best venue now
—
No venue has enough recent benchmarked fills for this filter yet.
0
venues
0
total fills
0
benchmarked
0%
coverage
visual comparison
Recent round-trip venue cost
lower is better
No venue metrics matched this filter yet. The backend dashboard endpoint reads the rolling metrics ingester; it needs recent decoded fills plus exact-second Autonom fair-price history. Check `WEB2_METRICS_ENABLED`, `WEB2_METRICS_VENUES`, RPC access, and catalog mappings for each venue.
recent decoded fills
Live fill tape
fills with no exact-second benchmark are counted for coverage but excluded from exec stats; fees shown here are per leg
No recent fills in this window yet. Confirm `WEB2_METRICS_ENABLED` is on and `WEB2_METRICS_VENUES` includes the venues you want to poll.
methodology
• Exec bps is slippage versus the exact-second Autonom benchmark; live fill rows are single legs.
• Dashboard fee and all-in cards estimate a full open+close round trip by doubling the recent single-leg fee/exec statistics. Network gas is not included.
• Lower bps is better. Negative bps means the venue filled better than the benchmark.
• Low sample and low benchmark coverage reduce confidence in venue ranking.